Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Franz Kafka --- littérature polonaise --- Théâtre

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Ludwig Dietz: Attributionen an Musil und Borchardt Astrid Lange-Kirchheim: Zwei frühe Rezensionen zu Arthur Schnitzlers Spätwerk Elsbeth Dangel-Pelloquin: Ein Spiel von Original und Fälschung in »Die Lästigen« Heinz Hiebler: Hofmannsthal und die Medienkultur der Moderne Bernhard Neuhoff: Ritual und Trauma bei Benjamin, Freud und Hofmannsthal Gabriele Brandstetter: Die Szene des Virtuosen Caroline Pross: Das Gesetz der Reihe in Schnitzlers »Reigen« Otto Neudeck und Gabriele Scheidt: Zerfall und Restituierung des Subjekts im dramatischen Werk Arthur Schnitzlers Isak Winkel Holm: Franz Kafkas Metaphern Bernd Stiegler: Raoul Hausmanns Theorie der Optophonetik Heiko Christians: Handkes »Poetik der Verlangsamung«

DSB --- Borchardt, Franz Kafka, Musil

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

What is a problem? What's asked in that question, and how does one even begin to take its measure? How else could one begin, except as one does with any other problem--by way of its impulsion. Of Learned Ignorance: Idea of a Treatise in Philosophy is about philosophy because philosophy is about problems: philosophy, in a word, is where problems become a problem. After Anti-Oedipus, in the Kafka book and in A Thousand Plateaus, what Deleuze and Guattari counsel, strikingly, is sobriety. Sobriety is what they praise in Kafka. And it is sobriety that seems above all else to be necessary here. (Steven Shaviro has pointed out the prominence of structure in Deleuze's writing: "even when Deleuze's prose, by himself or with Guattari, seems to be ranging anarchically all over the place, in fact it has a rigid and unvarying architecture, which is what keeps it from falling apart.") Of Learned Ignorance is a dead letter because it names a problem. It's a dead letter because it is, cautiously, a love letter. It's a dead letter because it lovingly stages an experiment in whimsy, and perhaps above all, because it is problematic (in the Kantian sense): It is a (sober) attempt at exemplifying what it talks about -- and what eludes it: A series of footnotes, with blank (transcriptive) pages above, effects something like the integration of a differential, the reciprocal determination where the sources enter into in relation to one another in order to produce a paper, essay, or (inexistent) (chap)book. Of Learned Ignorance, in facing down a problem, makes a wager; it courts failure; it puts it all on the line. All, yes, for love -- a kind of love ... (of wisdom?).

Philosophy (General) --- philosophy --- Emmanuel Kant --- Franz Kafka --- Louis Althusser --- Gilles Deleuze --- Felix Guattari

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

What is a problem? What's asked in that question, and how does one even begin to take its measure? How else could one begin, except as one does with any other problem--by way of its impulsion. Of Learned Ignorance: Idea of a Treatise in Philosophy is about philosophy because philosophy is about problems: philosophy, in a word, is where problems become a problem. After Anti-Oedipus, in the Kafka book and in A Thousand Plateaus, what Deleuze and Guattari counsel, strikingly, is sobriety. Sobriety is what they praise in Kafka. And it is sobriety that seems above all else to be necessary here. (Steven Shaviro has pointed out the prominence of structure in Deleuze's writing: "even when Deleuze's prose, by himself or with Guattari, seems to be ranging anarchically all over the place, in fact it has a rigid and unvarying architecture, which is what keeps it from falling apart.") Of Learned Ignorance is a dead letter because it names a problem. It's a dead letter because it is, cautiously, a love letter. It's a dead letter because it lovingly stages an experiment in whimsy, and perhaps above all, because it is problematic (in the Kantian sense): It is a (sober) attempt at exemplifying what it talks about -- and what eludes it: A series of footnotes, with blank (transcriptive) pages above, effects something like the integration of a differential, the reciprocal determination where the sources enter into in relation to one another in order to produce a paper, essay, or (inexistent) (chap)book. Of Learned Ignorance, in facing down a problem, makes a wager; it courts failure; it puts it all on the line. All, yes, for love -- a kind of love ... (of wisdom?).

Philosophy (General) --- philosophy --- Emmanuel Kant --- Franz Kafka --- Louis Althusser --- Gilles Deleuze --- Felix Guattari

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Jonathan Kassner widmet sich dem Thema der Hundefiguren in der Literatur aus ästhetischer und ideengeschichtlicher Sicht. Er nimmt seinen Ausgang von der klassischen Ästhetik, die die Auseinandersetzung mit Tieren und der menschlichen Tierlichkeit führt, um stets den autonomen Geist über die Natur triumphieren zu lassen. Dagegen artikuliert sich parallel in der Literatur durch Tierfiguren, und insbesondere durch Hunde, ein Gegendiskurs zum vorherrschenden Idealismus der Zeit. Der Autor liest Hunde als poetologische Reflexionsfiguren, mit denen Autoren wie Goethe und Jean Paul und in der Moderne Kafka und Thomas Mann sowohl ästhetische als auch ontologische Fragen verhandeln. Er rekonstruiert in textnahen Lektüren den Übergang von der humanistischen Ästhetik der Klassiker zu einer Ästhetik der Kreatur, deren Spur er vom Faust bis zum Doktor Faustus verfolgt.

Animal Studies --- Hunde --- Ästhetik --- Kreatürlichkeit --- Tiere --- Johann Wolfgang Goethe --- Jean Paul --- Franz Kafka --- Thomas Mann --- Goethezeit --- Moderne